FAQ: Price/part vs. price/weight in LEGO sets
Q: Should we look at price to weight ratios for LEGO sets instead of price to part?
A: No. No we should not.
In terms of production costs, the price of the raw ABS that goes into each set is minuscule. In a quick search as a consumer, not even having access to true high-volume industrial pricing, the price of ABS looked to be around $1/lb. in moderate bulk and I'm sure with the outrageous quantities LEGO deals with, they get a significantly better deal than that. The $800 USD UCS Millennium Falcon thus contains less than $25 worth of plastic.The smaller LEGO pieces are, the more they weigh for a given volume of completed set; 8x 1x1 bricks weigh more than a single 2x4 brick that takes up the same space, and 3x 1x1 plates weigh more than a 1x1 brick. In other words weight and what I simply call "volume of stuff," the total amount of visible/usable product when assembled, are not directly coupled measures. You can easily make one LEGO model smaller, yet heavier than another with the same general design.The sense of value that consumers derive from a LEGO set has nothing to do with its weight. We care about its size, play features & fun, complexity, level of detail & visual interest, accuracy if applicable, and construction.With the release of 2019's Ultimate Collector Series Imperial Star Destroyer, many people compared the weight of its package to that of the UCS Millennium Falcon to arrive at a single data point "proof" that LEGO prices all of their products by the weight of the raw ABS plastic (plus bags, cardboard, instruction book paper & binding, etc.). The boxed Star Destroyer came in at $0.055 USD per gram, with the Millennium Falcon at $0.060/g. That's within 9% of each other or even potentially "equal" if you round off another decimal point. However the theory falls apart quickly if you look at more than two sets. Bricklink displays the total weight of just the individual components in each set inventoried in its catalog, sans packaging. Even sticking strictly to boxed minifig-compatible Star Wars sets from 2018-2019, the range is far too wide for comfort:
75229 $0.099/g75217 $0.094/g75220 $0.083/g75243 $0.080/g75222 $0.075/g75203 $0.071/g75234 $0.067/g75214 $0.052/g
The data doesn't fit the hypothesis, and there's no good logical argument in favor either.
Original author: theJANG